Sibyl vs Holographic — Memory at the Grain
Status: Published. Decision: staying on Holographic for now.
A head-to-head comparison of two SQLite-backed agentic memory systems for Hermes Agent:
- Holographic: Local-first, zero-dependency memory provider with Phase Holographic Reduced Representations (HRR) for compositional retrieval. Unlimited database size, no accounts, no cloud roundtrips.
- Sibyl Memory: Five-tier hierarchical schema (HOT/WARM/COLD/REFERENCE/ARCHIVE) with self-learning, LongMemEval-validated (95.6%), but requires cloud activation and has a 2 MB free cap.
The Verdict
Sibyl wins on features and benchmarks. Holographic wins on operational simplicity — zero external dependencies, unlimited storage, trust-based fact management.
For a system designed around local-first operation from day one, Holographic is the right choice — but we’d love a local-only port of Sibyl’s multi-tier schema.
Full Analysis
Source Files
- Research notes in
/Volumes/Mini_1Tb/Projects/research/sibyl_memory/ - Evaluation sources:
/Volumes/Mini_1Tb/Projects/research/sibyl_memory_evaluation_sources/